<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 434 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, manufacturers of petroleum products, in a case concerning the denial of a concessional rate of duty for blending ethanol with petrol. The Tribunal held that the Appellants complied with blending requirements, maintained product standards, and used the products as intended, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. The Tribunal also dismissed allegations regarding the blending process location, the need for a license from BIS authorities, and collecting amounts representing excise duty from consumers. It granted a stay on the collection of dues, emphasizing the unjust denial of the exemption by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 434 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, manufacturers of petroleum products, in a case concerning the denial of a concessional rate of duty for blending ethanol with petrol. The Tribunal held that the Appellants complied with blending requirements, maintained product standards, and used the products as intended, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. The Tribunal also dismissed allegations regarding the blending process location, the need for a license from BIS authorities, and collecting amounts representing excise duty from consumers. It granted a stay on the collection of dues, emphasizing the unjust denial of the exemption by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>