<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246369</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the demand of duty and penalty, leading to an appeal by the Revenue. The Assistant Commissioner confirmed duty on final products and raw materials, imposing penalties. The Appellate Authority upheld demands for final products but questioned duty confirmation based on raw material shortages. The Tribunal found the shortage insufficient for final product manufacture, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision emphasized the need for evidence of other raw material procurements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246369</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the demand of duty and penalty, leading to an appeal by the Revenue. The Assistant Commissioner confirmed duty on final products and raw materials, imposing penalties. The Appellate Authority upheld demands for final products but questioned duty confirmation based on raw material shortages. The Tribunal found the shortage insufficient for final product manufacture, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision emphasized the need for evidence of other raw material procurements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>