https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246368 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authority's decision regarding the transfer of equipment between Export Oriented Units (EOUs). It was determined that the discrepancy in equipment description did not amount to contravention of import policies or Customs duty evasion. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, waiving the pre-deposit of duties for appeal admission and providing consequential benefits. The impugned order was overturned, and both the stay petition and appeal were granted by the Tribunal. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:07:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246368 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authority's decision regarding the transfer of equipment between Export Oriented Units (EOUs). It was determined that the discrepancy in equipment description did not amount to contravention of import policies or Customs duty evasion. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, waiving the pre-deposit of duties for appeal admission and providing consequential benefits. The impugned order was overturned, and both the stay petition and appeal were granted by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246368