<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 128 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246366</link>
    <description>Slub yarn produced from polyester and viscose fibres through special mechanical stimulation by an electronic device was treated as a special yarn because the process created thick-and-thin features and imparted the slub effect during spinning. On that basis, the product was not regarded as normal yarn for classification under Heading 5506. The Tribunal accepted Revenue&#039;s view that the correct classification was under Heading 5606 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the contrary claim for Heading 5506 was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:07:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 128 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246366</link>
      <description>Slub yarn produced from polyester and viscose fibres through special mechanical stimulation by an electronic device was treated as a special yarn because the process created thick-and-thin features and imparted the slub effect during spinning. On that basis, the product was not regarded as normal yarn for classification under Heading 5506. The Tribunal accepted Revenue&#039;s view that the correct classification was under Heading 5606 of the Central Excise Tariff, and the contrary claim for Heading 5506 was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>