<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 109 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, reducing the penalty on the company and setting aside the penalty imposed on the Director. The judgment clarified the application of rules concerning penalties in cases involving Cenvat Credit misuse and highlighted the distinction between penalties for companies and individuals in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:04:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 109 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, reducing the penalty on the company and setting aside the penalty imposed on the Director. The judgment clarified the application of rules concerning penalties in cases involving Cenvat Credit misuse and highlighted the distinction between penalties for companies and individuals in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>