<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 106 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246344</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the established merits of the case regarding the availing of CENVAT credit on both raw materials and job-worked goods. The Tribunal did not address the limitation aspect, ultimately finding the demand for duty, interest, and penalty unsustainable in this scenario.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:04:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 106 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246344</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the established merits of the case regarding the availing of CENVAT credit on both raw materials and job-worked goods. The Tribunal did not address the limitation aspect, ultimately finding the demand for duty, interest, and penalty unsustainable in this scenario.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>