https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246324 The Tribunal found that the appellant had passed the bar of unjust enrichment by providing bank realisation certificates and debit notes as evidence. The documentary evidence proved that the duty amount had been refunded by the foreign buyer. Consequently, the impugned order denying the refund claim was set aside, and the original adjudication order sanctioning the refund claim was restored. The appeal was allowed, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:01:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246324 The Tribunal found that the appellant had passed the bar of unjust enrichment by providing bank realisation certificates and debit notes as evidence. The documentary evidence proved that the duty amount had been refunded by the foreign buyer. Consequently, the impugned order denying the refund claim was set aside, and the original adjudication order sanctioning the refund claim was restored. The appeal was allowed, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246324