<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 432 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, criticizing the department&#039;s lack of reasoning in determining assessable value based solely on Maximum Retail Price (MRP) without considering cost elements. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of justifying decisions with proper reasoning and evidence, ultimately permitting variations in MRP and dispensing with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 432 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, criticizing the department&#039;s lack of reasoning in determining assessable value based solely on Maximum Retail Price (MRP) without considering cost elements. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of justifying decisions with proper reasoning and evidence, ultimately permitting variations in MRP and dispensing with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>