<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 567 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that they were not required to pay 10% of the value of zinc dross under Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal determined that since the appellants could prove importing more zinc dross than cleared, there was no obligation to make the payment. The decision emphasized the practical challenges in segregating imported and manufactured zinc dross and stressed the importance of interpreting tax rules sensibly while ensuring compliance with record-keeping obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 567 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that they were not required to pay 10% of the value of zinc dross under Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal determined that since the appellants could prove importing more zinc dross than cleared, there was no obligation to make the payment. The decision emphasized the practical challenges in segregating imported and manufactured zinc dross and stressed the importance of interpreting tax rules sensibly while ensuring compliance with record-keeping obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>