<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246311</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand with interest and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The appellant successfully argued that they received the old conveyor system from another company and cleared it without modification, as part of a buy-back agreement for a new system. The Tribunal found the demand unsustainable due to lack of evidence supporting Revenue&#039;s claim of undervaluation and modification charges, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and canceling the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246311</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand with interest and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The appellant successfully argued that they received the old conveyor system from another company and cleared it without modification, as part of a buy-back agreement for a new system. The Tribunal found the demand unsustainable due to lack of evidence supporting Revenue&#039;s claim of undervaluation and modification charges, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and canceling the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>