https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246304 The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand on goods cleared with quantitative discounts, citing the limitation defense. The appellants consistently reported clearances with discounts in their monthly returns, which were accepted without inquiry by lower authorities. As no communication was made regarding the duty liability on claimed discounts under Section 4A, the demands were deemed time-barred. The orders were overturned based on the limitation aspect, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants. en-us Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246304 The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand on goods cleared with quantitative discounts, citing the limitation defense. The appellants consistently reported clearances with discounts in their monthly returns, which were accepted without inquiry by lower authorities. As no communication was made regarding the duty liability on claimed discounts under Section 4A, the demands were deemed time-barred. The orders were overturned based on the limitation aspect, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246304