https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246297 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the appeal and emphasizing the importance of adhering to Cenvat credit rules, including the inclusion of service values in goods' transaction value for credit eligibility. The penalty under Section 11AC was justified due to the appellant's non-disclosure and fraudulent practices, while the option for a reduced penalty highlighted the significance of timely compliance with tax obligations. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:58:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246297 The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the appeal and emphasizing the importance of adhering to Cenvat credit rules, including the inclusion of service values in goods' transaction value for credit eligibility. The penalty under Section 11AC was justified due to the appellant's non-disclosure and fraudulent practices, while the option for a reduced penalty highlighted the significance of timely compliance with tax obligations. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246297