https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246290 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's Misc. application seeking the recall of a pre-deposit order, citing the Counsel's inability to present key facts and absence of medical evidence as insufficient reasons for adjournment. Emphasizing the importance of timely proceedings and preventing prejudice to the Revenue, the Tribunal extended the deposit deadline by 4 weeks to balance the appellant's hardship with the legal process and Revenue interests. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246290 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's Misc. application seeking the recall of a pre-deposit order, citing the Counsel's inability to present key facts and absence of medical evidence as insufficient reasons for adjournment. Emphasizing the importance of timely proceedings and preventing prejudice to the Revenue, the Tribunal extended the deposit deadline by 4 weeks to balance the appellant's hardship with the legal process and Revenue interests. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246290