<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246288</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit is available to the recipient where duty has been charged and collected on a repair invoice, even if the underlying repair activity does not amount to manufacture. The duty-paid invoice remained a valid basis for credit because the department had not revised the assessment at the repairer&#039;s end or undone the duty payment by refund. Credit could not be denied at the recipient&#039;s end on the ground that the service was repair rather than manufacture, and the cited precedent applied the same principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:54:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246288</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit is available to the recipient where duty has been charged and collected on a repair invoice, even if the underlying repair activity does not amount to manufacture. The duty-paid invoice remained a valid basis for credit because the department had not revised the assessment at the repairer&#039;s end or undone the duty payment by refund. Credit could not be denied at the recipient&#039;s end on the ground that the service was repair rather than manufacture, and the cited precedent applied the same principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>