https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246283 The judge rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving the diversion of imported raw materials meant for manufacturing goods for export. The judge disagreed with the Revenue's argument that confiscation was justified, citing the absence of goods released provisionally on bond required for confiscation. As the diverted goods were no longer available for confiscation, being someone else's property, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of merit in the Revenue's contentions. en-us Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:51:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246283 The judge rejected the Revenue's appeal in a case involving the diversion of imported raw materials meant for manufacturing goods for export. The judge disagreed with the Revenue's argument that confiscation was justified, citing the absence of goods released provisionally on bond required for confiscation. As the diverted goods were no longer available for confiscation, being someone else's property, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of merit in the Revenue's contentions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246283