https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246275 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products. The Tribunal held that Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to such capital goods, allowing the appellant to claim Cenvat credit. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery sought by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of interpreting rules in the context of the specific case and ensuring compliance with legal provisions. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:46:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246275 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products. The Tribunal held that Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to such capital goods, allowing the appellant to claim Cenvat credit. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery sought by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of interpreting rules in the context of the specific case and ensuring compliance with legal provisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246275