<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 530 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246272</link>
    <description>Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the exported Bearing Housing Assembly and the domestic Turbine Wheels were found to have different characteristics, different functions and no commercial interchangeability, despite both being used in turbo chargers. The appellants also failed to show any similarity beyond that common component description. On limitation, the department&#039;s allegation of suppression regarding use of imported and indigenous raw materials was found prima facie sustainable. As no separate financial hardship was demonstrated, complete waiver was declined and a partial pre-deposit was required, with the balance stayed subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 530 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246272</link>
      <description>Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit was refused because the exported Bearing Housing Assembly and the domestic Turbine Wheels were found to have different characteristics, different functions and no commercial interchangeability, despite both being used in turbo chargers. The appellants also failed to show any similarity beyond that common component description. On limitation, the department&#039;s allegation of suppression regarding use of imported and indigenous raw materials was found prima facie sustainable. As no separate financial hardship was demonstrated, complete waiver was declined and a partial pre-deposit was required, with the balance stayed subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>