<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 876 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246267</link>
    <description>The product Shaheen Masheri was held classifiable under Chapter Heading 3306.10 as tooth powder, not under Chapter Heading 2404.99 as manufactured tobacco. The classification issue had already been conclusively settled in prior proceedings on the basis of the common parlance test, and that view had been affirmed by the Supreme Court. Because the identical product had already attained finality on classification, the contrary view in the impugned order could not stand, and the demand and penalties were unsustainable. The appeals were allowed and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 876 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246267</link>
      <description>The product Shaheen Masheri was held classifiable under Chapter Heading 3306.10 as tooth powder, not under Chapter Heading 2404.99 as manufactured tobacco. The classification issue had already been conclusively settled in prior proceedings on the basis of the common parlance test, and that view had been affirmed by the Supreme Court. Because the identical product had already attained finality on classification, the contrary view in the impugned order could not stand, and the demand and penalties were unsustainable. The appeals were allowed and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>