<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 988 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It held that as no credit was actually taken, the liability to pay interest did not apply. The lower appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by considering issues beyond the scope of the appeal, leading to the successful appeal of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 988 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order. It held that as no credit was actually taken, the liability to pay interest did not apply. The lower appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by considering issues beyond the scope of the appeal, leading to the successful appeal of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>