https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164213 A writ petition seeking to restrain authorities from proceeding with a proposition notice was held premature where objections had already been filed and the statutory assessment process was still pending. No final assessment order had been passed, so no firm cause of action had arisen, and the availability of a statutory appeal against any adverse assessment under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 weighed against writ intervention. The pendency of a similar matter before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal did not justify deferring consideration of the notice, and the notice was not shown to be time-barred or without jurisdiction. Mandamus or prohibitory relief was therefore unavailable, and writ relief was refused. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:17:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164213 A writ petition seeking to restrain authorities from proceeding with a proposition notice was held premature where objections had already been filed and the statutory assessment process was still pending. No final assessment order had been passed, so no firm cause of action had arisen, and the availability of a statutory appeal against any adverse assessment under Section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 weighed against writ intervention. The pendency of a similar matter before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal did not justify deferring consideration of the notice, and the notice was not shown to be time-barred or without jurisdiction. Mandamus or prohibitory relief was therefore unavailable, and writ relief was refused. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164213