<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 832 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164184</link>
    <description>A settlement certificate cannot be revoked except in strict compliance with the statutory procedure, including a specific notice disclosing definite grounds, particulars and a real opportunity of hearing; on the facts, the vague notice and ex parte disposal rendered the revocation invalid, though fresh proceedings were left open. A suo motu revisional proceeding cannot be initiated while the settlement certificate remains operative, and the revisional authority must independently examine the record before exercising power; here, the pre-revocation, mechanical revision was incompetent and was quashed. As the recovery demand depended entirely on the failed revision, the consequential tax recovery proceeding also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 832 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164184</link>
      <description>A settlement certificate cannot be revoked except in strict compliance with the statutory procedure, including a specific notice disclosing definite grounds, particulars and a real opportunity of hearing; on the facts, the vague notice and ex parte disposal rendered the revocation invalid, though fresh proceedings were left open. A suo motu revisional proceeding cannot be initiated while the settlement certificate remains operative, and the revisional authority must independently examine the record before exercising power; here, the pre-revocation, mechanical revision was incompetent and was quashed. As the recovery demand depended entirely on the failed revision, the consequential tax recovery proceeding also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>