https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246256 A writ challenge to an assessment order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was treated as inappropriate because the statute provided an efficacious appellate remedy under Section 62. The settled principle applied was that Article 226 jurisdiction is discretionary and is ordinarily not exercised in fiscal matters where an alternate remedy exists. The assessment challenge was therefore left to the appellate authority, and writ interference was declined. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:13:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246256 A writ challenge to an assessment order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act was treated as inappropriate because the statute provided an efficacious appellate remedy under Section 62. The settled principle applied was that Article 226 jurisdiction is discretionary and is ordinarily not exercised in fiscal matters where an alternate remedy exists. The assessment challenge was therefore left to the appellate authority, and writ interference was declined. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246256