<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of predeposit of interest and penalty amounting to Rs.19,80,691/-, citing the applicant&#039;s argument that the tax payment was not warranted based on a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. Despite having paid the tax, the applicant contested the interest demand, supported by the Tribunal&#039;s observation that the tax payment was unjustified. The Tribunal relied on the High Court&#039;s invalidation of a relevant rule to waive the predeposit, also staying the recovery process pending appeal. The stay application was consequently granted by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of predeposit of interest and penalty amounting to Rs.19,80,691/-, citing the applicant&#039;s argument that the tax payment was not warranted based on a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. Despite having paid the tax, the applicant contested the interest demand, supported by the Tribunal&#039;s observation that the tax payment was unjustified. The Tribunal relied on the High Court&#039;s invalidation of a relevant rule to waive the predeposit, also staying the recovery process pending appeal. The stay application was consequently granted by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>