<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 656 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Custom House Agent for non-compliance with minimum educational qualifications by an employee. The appellant&#039;s lack of awareness regarding the unrecognized educational board, along with the approving authority&#039;s negligence, led to the conclusion that the penalty was unjustified. The shared responsibility between the appellant and the approving authorities for ensuring compliance, coupled with the absence of revenue loss or misconduct, resulted in the decision to allow the appeal and revoke the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 656 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Custom House Agent for non-compliance with minimum educational qualifications by an employee. The appellant&#039;s lack of awareness regarding the unrecognized educational board, along with the approving authority&#039;s negligence, led to the conclusion that the penalty was unjustified. The shared responsibility between the appellant and the approving authorities for ensuring compliance, coupled with the absence of revenue loss or misconduct, resulted in the decision to allow the appeal and revoke the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>