https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164162 Where an assessee has already invoked the statutory appellate remedy against penalty orders, writ interference is ordinarily declined and the parties are left to pursue the appeal. The commentary also notes that the limitation objection to the penalty proceedings was rejected, treating the relevant period as extended and reckoning time from detection of the offence. Limited protective directions were issued regarding return of seized records and suspension of recovery until the stay and delay-condonation applications were decided in appeal. The complaint about non-supply of legible copies was rejected for want of shown prejudice. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164162 Where an assessee has already invoked the statutory appellate remedy against penalty orders, writ interference is ordinarily declined and the parties are left to pursue the appeal. The commentary also notes that the limitation objection to the penalty proceedings was rejected, treating the relevant period as extended and reckoning time from detection of the offence. Limited protective directions were issued regarding return of seized records and suspension of recovery until the stay and delay-condonation applications were decided in appeal. The complaint about non-supply of legible copies was rejected for want of shown prejudice. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164162