<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 855 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164161</link>
    <description>A purchase-side commission or special discount received from the manufacturer on prompt payment did not form part of the dealer&#039;s sale price or taxable turnover under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, because it was not a discount granted on the dealer&#039;s own sales. Goods returned in a subsequent return period were deductible under rule 159 where tax had been paid in the earlier sale period, and the deduction was not confined to current-period stock-in-trade. The disallowance of the returned-goods claim was therefore unsustainable and required reconsideration under the rule, with the assessment and revisional decisions interfered with to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 855 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164161</link>
      <description>A purchase-side commission or special discount received from the manufacturer on prompt payment did not form part of the dealer&#039;s sale price or taxable turnover under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, because it was not a discount granted on the dealer&#039;s own sales. Goods returned in a subsequent return period were deductible under rule 159 where tax had been paid in the earlier sale period, and the deduction was not confined to current-period stock-in-trade. The disallowance of the returned-goods claim was therefore unsustainable and required reconsideration under the rule, with the assessment and revisional decisions interfered with to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>