<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 882 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164154</link>
    <description>Sale of goods is inter-State only where movement from one State to another is occasioned by the contract itself, either by an express or implied covenant, or as an inseparable incident of the transaction. Mere buyer residence outside the State, exporter status, transit passes, or subsequent movement of the goods is insufficient. On the facts, the tender and purchase agreements for bamboos and tendupatta did not require or necessarily contemplate movement outside Madhya Pradesh, and the transit movement was independent of the sale. The transactions were therefore not inter-State sales under section 3(a) of the CST Act and remained taxable under State law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 882 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164154</link>
      <description>Sale of goods is inter-State only where movement from one State to another is occasioned by the contract itself, either by an express or implied covenant, or as an inseparable incident of the transaction. Mere buyer residence outside the State, exporter status, transit passes, or subsequent movement of the goods is insufficient. On the facts, the tender and purchase agreements for bamboos and tendupatta did not require or necessarily contemplate movement outside Madhya Pradesh, and the transit movement was independent of the sale. The transactions were therefore not inter-State sales under section 3(a) of the CST Act and remained taxable under State law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>