<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Authority&#039;s Jurisdiction to Reduce Penalty u/s 78 Upheld; Revenue&#039;s Argument Deemed Illegal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18220</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 78 - the contention of the Revenue that the authority has no jurisdiction to reduce the penalty to 25% is ex facie illegal and contrary to the statutory provision. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:29:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:29:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Authority&#039;s Jurisdiction to Reduce Penalty u/s 78 Upheld; Revenue&#039;s Argument Deemed Illegal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18220</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 78 - the contention of the Revenue that the authority has no jurisdiction to reduce the penalty to 25% is ex facie illegal and contrary to the statutory provision. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:29:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>