<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246195</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the review application in T.C.A.No.215 of 2008, finding no error apparent on the face of the record warranting a review. Emphasizing that a review is not an appeal in disguise, the Court rejected the applicant&#039;s contentions, stating that the alleged errors were not manifest or apparent on the record. The Court reiterated that the power of review cannot be used to re-argue the matter and confirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246195</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the review application in T.C.A.No.215 of 2008, finding no error apparent on the face of the record warranting a review. Emphasizing that a review is not an appeal in disguise, the Court rejected the applicant&#039;s contentions, stating that the alleged errors were not manifest or apparent on the record. The Court reiterated that the power of review cannot be used to re-argue the matter and confirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>