<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 619 - ITAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, directing that the profits for both assessment years be estimated at a G.P. rate of 20%, rather than the 40% applied by the A.O. or the N.P. rate used by the CIT(A). This decision aimed to provide a fair estimation of the Assessee&#039;s unaccounted income while acknowledging the discrepancies in the recorded expenses and sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 619 - ITAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, directing that the profits for both assessment years be estimated at a G.P. rate of 20%, rather than the 40% applied by the A.O. or the N.P. rate used by the CIT(A). This decision aimed to provide a fair estimation of the Assessee&#039;s unaccounted income while acknowledging the discrepancies in the recorded expenses and sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>