<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 613 - ITAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246176</link>
    <description>Alleged unaccounted job-work receipts from processed fabrics required fresh examination on the basis of the assessee&#039;s working, so the quantum addition was restored to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The concealment penalty could not be sustained independently at that stage and was also remitted to follow the result of the quantum proceedings. The matters were therefore disposed of for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 613 - ITAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246176</link>
      <description>Alleged unaccounted job-work receipts from processed fabrics required fresh examination on the basis of the assessee&#039;s working, so the quantum addition was restored to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The concealment penalty could not be sustained independently at that stage and was also remitted to follow the result of the quantum proceedings. The matters were therefore disposed of for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>