https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246171 Choice of English law and incorporation of the Refined Sugar Association, London rules impliedly excluded Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Because the contract treated itself, the place of performance, and the arbitral seat as England, and the arbitration clause required disputes to be resolved under English law, the Court found that both the contract and the arbitration agreement were governed by English law. On that footing, a Section 34 challenge in India to the foreign award was not maintainable, and the objection to Indian jurisdiction was upheld. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246171 Choice of English law and incorporation of the Refined Sugar Association, London rules impliedly excluded Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Because the contract treated itself, the place of performance, and the arbitral seat as England, and the arbitration clause required disputes to be resolved under English law, the Court found that both the contract and the arbitration agreement were governed by English law. On that footing, a Section 34 challenge in India to the foreign award was not maintainable, and the objection to Indian jurisdiction was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246171