<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 603 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246166</link>
    <description>Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was applied to clearances of aluminium pipes supplied to an SEZ developer without payment of duty. The Tribunal relied on prior decisions holding such supplies to be covered by the rule, and treated the December 2008 amendment as retrospective. On that basis, the clearances were valid duty-free supplies to the SEZ developer, so the demand, interest and penalty had no legal foundation and were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 603 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246166</link>
      <description>Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was applied to clearances of aluminium pipes supplied to an SEZ developer without payment of duty. The Tribunal relied on prior decisions holding such supplies to be covered by the rule, and treated the December 2008 amendment as retrospective. On that basis, the clearances were valid duty-free supplies to the SEZ developer, so the demand, interest and penalty had no legal foundation and were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>