https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164141 The High Court upheld the penalty imposed on a private limited company for misuse of C form under section 10(d) of the CST Act, 1956, amounting to Rs. 2,30,580. The court ruled that the assessee's failure to raise objections earlier precluded them from contesting the penalty at a later stage. The petition was dismissed, allowing the levy of penalty under section 10A of the CST Act, with no costs awarded to either party. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a memo of appearance. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164141 The High Court upheld the penalty imposed on a private limited company for misuse of C form under section 10(d) of the CST Act, 1956, amounting to Rs. 2,30,580. The court ruled that the assessee's failure to raise objections earlier precluded them from contesting the penalty at a later stage. The petition was dismissed, allowing the levy of penalty under section 10A of the CST Act, with no costs awarded to either party. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a memo of appearance. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164141