<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 955 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164140</link>
    <description>Potato chips sold as branded snack items were held not to fall within the concessional entry for processed vegetables under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Applying ordinary, popular and commercial meaning, the court noted that the statutory list of concessional processed foods did not expressly include processed potato or potato chips, even though other processed items were specifically named. Because the product was understood in common parlance as a snack and not as a processed vegetable of the kind contemplated by the entry, it was placed in the residuary taxable category under Part III of Schedule A. The revenue classification was upheld and the concessional rate was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 955 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164140</link>
      <description>Potato chips sold as branded snack items were held not to fall within the concessional entry for processed vegetables under the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Applying ordinary, popular and commercial meaning, the court noted that the statutory list of concessional processed foods did not expressly include processed potato or potato chips, even though other processed items were specifically named. Because the product was understood in common parlance as a snack and not as a processed vegetable of the kind contemplated by the entry, it was placed in the residuary taxable category under Part III of Schedule A. The revenue classification was upheld and the concessional rate was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>