<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 904 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164133</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption dispute turned on alleged non-compliance with clause 4(e)(i) of the Sales Tax Exemption Scheme, 1987, which required maintenance of average production. The State later deleted that condition retrospectively from the Scheme&#039;s commencement and issued administrative directions authorising write-off of demands raised on that basis. Once the condition was retrospectively removed, the foundation for withdrawal of exemption, demand notices, and related assessment action ceased to exist. Following an earlier cognate decision, the Rajasthan HC treated the proceedings as unsustainable and quashed the demand and connected orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 904 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164133</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption dispute turned on alleged non-compliance with clause 4(e)(i) of the Sales Tax Exemption Scheme, 1987, which required maintenance of average production. The State later deleted that condition retrospectively from the Scheme&#039;s commencement and issued administrative directions authorising write-off of demands raised on that basis. Once the condition was retrospectively removed, the foundation for withdrawal of exemption, demand notices, and related assessment action ceased to exist. Following an earlier cognate decision, the Rajasthan HC treated the proceedings as unsustainable and quashed the demand and connected orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>