<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 875 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164126</link>
    <description>Sanction to reopen assessment under section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held invalid where the authority granted permission mechanically, without considering the assessee&#039;s objections and without recording reasons. The court followed the principle that the assessee must be heard at the sanction stage and that the decision must reflect application of mind. Because the sanction order was non-speaking and arbitrary, the consequential reassessment notice could not survive and was set aside. Fresh consideration after hearing the assessee was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2014 21:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 875 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164126</link>
      <description>Sanction to reopen assessment under section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held invalid where the authority granted permission mechanically, without considering the assessee&#039;s objections and without recording reasons. The court followed the principle that the assessee must be heard at the sanction stage and that the decision must reflect application of mind. Because the sanction order was non-speaking and arbitrary, the consequential reassessment notice could not survive and was set aside. Fresh consideration after hearing the assessee was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>