<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 597 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246160</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s activity did not qualify as &#039;business auxiliary services&#039; for Service Tax. The Court directed the revenue to approach the Apex Court under Section 35L of the Excise Act for review, deeming the appeal not maintainable under Section 35G.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 597 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246160</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s activity did not qualify as &#039;business auxiliary services&#039; for Service Tax. The Court directed the revenue to approach the Apex Court under Section 35L of the Excise Act for review, deeming the appeal not maintainable under Section 35G.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>