<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 651 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164091</link>
    <description>Enhancement of assessment without issuing the mandatory notice under Rule 50(3) of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 was held to violate natural justice. The notice requirement is a mandatory procedural safeguard before any enhancement, and non-compliance vitiates the appellate order. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 651 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164091</link>
      <description>Enhancement of assessment without issuing the mandatory notice under Rule 50(3) of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, 1947 was held to violate natural justice. The notice requirement is a mandatory procedural safeguard before any enhancement, and non-compliance vitiates the appellate order. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>