<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 767 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164087</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a notice under section 13(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was found not maintainable where the underlying assessment order was already under challenge in a separate writ petition. The notice was treated as only a proposed step for recovery of assessed tax arrears and not as an instrument determining rights or effecting recovery by itself. Because the assessment liability was already in issue, an independent writ challenge to the recovery notice was considered unnecessary and without a separate cause of action. The proper course was to pursue relief in the pending writ petition against the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 767 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164087</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a notice under section 13(3)(b) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was found not maintainable where the underlying assessment order was already under challenge in a separate writ petition. The notice was treated as only a proposed step for recovery of assessed tax arrears and not as an instrument determining rights or effecting recovery by itself. Because the assessment liability was already in issue, an independent writ challenge to the recovery notice was considered unnecessary and without a separate cause of action. The proper course was to pursue relief in the pending writ petition against the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>