<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 882 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164078</link>
    <description>A subordinate taxing cannot disregard a subsisting revisional order that has held tax or penalty not recoverable in respect of the consignments concerned. A revisional order under the taxing statute binds departmental authorities until it is set aside by the competent forum or altered through the statutory mechanism, and the proper remedy for disagreement is appeal or rectification, not a fresh demand inconsistent with that order. The impugned demand order and notice were therefore without authority and could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 882 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164078</link>
      <description>A subordinate taxing cannot disregard a subsisting revisional order that has held tax or penalty not recoverable in respect of the consignments concerned. A revisional order under the taxing statute binds departmental authorities until it is set aside by the competent forum or altered through the statutory mechanism, and the proper remedy for disagreement is appeal or rectification, not a fresh demand inconsistent with that order. The impugned demand order and notice were therefore without authority and could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>