<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 766 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164070</link>
    <description>Section 42(1) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 permits reference only on a question of law arising out of the relevant order. The review order merely declined review of the earlier appellate decision and did not itself decide whether D.O.R.B. independently constituted cattle feed. Because the referred question did not emerge from the review order, the statutory condition for reference was not met, and the reference was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 766 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164070</link>
      <description>Section 42(1) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 permits reference only on a question of law arising out of the relevant order. The review order merely declined review of the earlier appellate decision and did not itself decide whether D.O.R.B. independently constituted cattle feed. Because the referred question did not emerge from the review order, the statutory condition for reference was not met, and the reference was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>