<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s limited estimate of taxable turnover and corresponding penalty relief was sustained because the accounts contained defects such as missing stock records, unsupported purchases, and incomplete documentation, yet those defects did not justify the larger addition made by the assessing authority. It accepted that the gross profit rate was normal for the business and that adopting the entire inter-State purchases turnover for estimation was unwarranted. The revision court found the Tribunal&#039;s partial relief consistent with the sales tax provisions and held that the matter turned on factual appraisal rather than any substantial question of law. The revision was therefore not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:33:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 862 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s limited estimate of taxable turnover and corresponding penalty relief was sustained because the accounts contained defects such as missing stock records, unsupported purchases, and incomplete documentation, yet those defects did not justify the larger addition made by the assessing authority. It accepted that the gross profit rate was normal for the business and that adopting the entire inter-State purchases turnover for estimation was unwarranted. The revision court found the Tribunal&#039;s partial relief consistent with the sales tax provisions and held that the matter turned on factual appraisal rather than any substantial question of law. The revision was therefore not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>