<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 896 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164063</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the revision petitions filed by the Revenue, upholding the decision of the Tax Board. It held that the freight charges separately charged by the respondent-assessee did not form part of the sale price, and thus, were not subject to sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act. The court emphasized that the contract in question was ex-works, not &quot;f.o.r. destination,&quot; based on the evidence presented. Previous legal interpretations supported this conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the revision petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 896 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164063</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the revision petitions filed by the Revenue, upholding the decision of the Tax Board. It held that the freight charges separately charged by the respondent-assessee did not form part of the sale price, and thus, were not subject to sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act. The court emphasized that the contract in question was ex-works, not &quot;f.o.r. destination,&quot; based on the evidence presented. Previous legal interpretations supported this conclusion, leading to the dismissal of the revision petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>