https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164061 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that despite a tax dispute, the State Beverage Corporation Limited was obligated to issue the statutory form D-III to the petitioner without demanding payment of the differential tax for earlier transactions. The Corporation was directed to promptly provide the necessary forms within two months, while retaining the right to pursue legal remedies to recover any outstanding amounts from the petitioner, including disputed tax differences if legally owed. en-us Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:18:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164061 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that despite a tax dispute, the State Beverage Corporation Limited was obligated to issue the statutory form D-III to the petitioner without demanding payment of the differential tax for earlier transactions. The Corporation was directed to promptly provide the necessary forms within two months, while retaining the right to pursue legal remedies to recover any outstanding amounts from the petitioner, including disputed tax differences if legally owed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164061