<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 616 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164060</link>
    <description>A fiscal incentive linked to acquisition of new fixed assets under the amended 1993 Package Scheme of Incentives could not be restricted by a pro rata production formula absent express authority. The substituted scheme provision omitted the earlier proportionate-use formula and did not permit year-wise limitation of benefits based on production attributable to the new assets. Neither the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 nor the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 empowered the Deputy Commissioner to impose such a ceiling, and later-inserted section 41BB could not operate without prescribed rules. The entitlement certificate conditions limiting incentives to 59.84% of production were therefore impermissible and liable to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 616 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164060</link>
      <description>A fiscal incentive linked to acquisition of new fixed assets under the amended 1993 Package Scheme of Incentives could not be restricted by a pro rata production formula absent express authority. The substituted scheme provision omitted the earlier proportionate-use formula and did not permit year-wise limitation of benefits based on production attributable to the new assets. Neither the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 nor the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 empowered the Deputy Commissioner to impose such a ceiling, and later-inserted section 41BB could not operate without prescribed rules. The entitlement certificate conditions limiting incentives to 59.84% of production were therefore impermissible and liable to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>