https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164049 The court declined to issue the writ of mandamus as sought by the petitioner regarding the refund of value-added tax paid on the purchase of capital goods. It emphasized that the specific amount for refund must be determined before such relief could be granted through a writ petition. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter before the authorities as per the law to seek the available reliefs, highlighting that quantification of the refund amount and following the legal claim process were essential. Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to seek remedies through appropriate legal channels. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:13:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164049 The court declined to issue the writ of mandamus as sought by the petitioner regarding the refund of value-added tax paid on the purchase of capital goods. It emphasized that the specific amount for refund must be determined before such relief could be granted through a writ petition. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter before the authorities as per the law to seek the available reliefs, highlighting that quantification of the refund amount and following the legal claim process were essential. Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to seek remedies through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164049