<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 587 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246150</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, a builder/developer, in a case concerning the classification of their services as works contract service for service tax payment purposes. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activities met the characteristics of a works contract, even though individual agreements were involved in selling flats. Referring to relevant definitions and precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was eligible for the composition scheme under works contract, setting aside the recovery demand of Rs. 14,09,78,092/- with interest and penalties. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 587 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246150</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, a builder/developer, in a case concerning the classification of their services as works contract service for service tax payment purposes. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activities met the characteristics of a works contract, even though individual agreements were involved in selling flats. Referring to relevant definitions and precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was eligible for the composition scheme under works contract, setting aside the recovery demand of Rs. 14,09,78,092/- with interest and penalties. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>