<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 571 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246134</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a registered input service distributor, in a case concerning the denial of cenvat credit on invoices due to deficiencies in debit notes. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s head office was entitled to transfer cenvat credit to its units, as supported by necessary details in the debit notes. Emphasizing the distributor&#039;s responsibility for assessing credit eligibility, the Tribunal overturned the denial of credit, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 571 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246134</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, a registered input service distributor, in a case concerning the denial of cenvat credit on invoices due to deficiencies in debit notes. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s head office was entitled to transfer cenvat credit to its units, as supported by necessary details in the debit notes. Emphasizing the distributor&#039;s responsibility for assessing credit eligibility, the Tribunal overturned the denial of credit, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>