<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 570 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appeal filed by the Revenue to be not maintainable due to lack of proper authorization by the Committee of Commissioners. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Committee to independently evaluate and form an opinion before filing an appeal, as merely appending signatures without meaningful consideration does not meet legal requirements. Citing previous decisions, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of complying with procedural requirements and rejected the appeal on grounds of insufficient authorization by the Committee of Commissioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 570 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appeal filed by the Revenue to be not maintainable due to lack of proper authorization by the Committee of Commissioners. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Committee to independently evaluate and form an opinion before filing an appeal, as merely appending signatures without meaningful consideration does not meet legal requirements. Citing previous decisions, the Tribunal highlighted the importance of complying with procedural requirements and rejected the appeal on grounds of insufficient authorization by the Committee of Commissioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>